Connect with us

Politics

Two years is enough for APC to make impact –Martins

Published

on

Former Chairman of Police Equipment Fund, Chief Kenny Martins, believes that it is wrong for the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led Federal Government to continue to blame its inability to fix the economy on the failure of the immediate past Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) government. He also speaks in this interview on the governance at the various tiers of government, security challenges and the clamour for state police as well as the 2019 general elections, among other issues. ADEWALE AJAYI reports

 

What is your assessment of the state of the nation?
It will be difficult to say things are going on well. Definitely, things are not going on well and this is reflective in many directions, platforms and context, but the most crucial issue in a democracy is the economy,; that is the democratic dividend. Everybody goes to the poll to vote because they believe they have some payback coming their way, and what is the payback they expect. Their payback expectation is to have their standard of life sustained or elevated; for their security to be guaranteed; to have job opportunities and to have peace and stability. Once these human expectations are taken care of, the people usually appreciate any government in place. But a case where they vote in a government and there are deficiencies is why the people always clamour for a change of government.
So, it is easy to score this government in power if it has done well or not. In the area of provision of infrastructure, are we faring well? Whether at the state, local government or federal level, we always try to assume that everything that goes wrong or right with us as a nation is about the federal government, but some of these issues stem from the local government to the state before the federal level. If I were to score the government in power at the national level, it will score below average, and that is not too good.

The government in power has persistently said that the mess in the economy was not its making, blaming it on the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) government. How would you react to that?
The APC-led Federal Government cannot blame its non performance and their inability to improve the economy on the PDP because if the PDP government then had performed, Nigerians wouldn’t have voted for APC. So, they should be happy over the non performance of the immediate past government because that made it possible for Nigerians to buy in into the APC Change mantra and voted the party into power. Now that they are in power, how well are they grappling with the problems? Putting into consideration, the problem of global recession, dropping of prices of oil that the government in power is experiencing, there is no doubt that, some of the actions of the past government will still reverberate in terms of negative considerations, but over two years in government is a long time to find their feet and move away from those setback and move away from the liabilities of the past government.
I think the government has not done well enough in the area of internal security. In the area of provision of jobs, nothing concrete has been done and to make it worse, you hear of state governments laying off their workers, giving the excuse that they don’t have money to pay their salaries as they had when they were recruiting the workers. In the private sector, there is high rate of retrenchment, especially in the banking industry, which is as a result of introduction of the Single Treasury Account, which could have been a good anti corruption move. Lack of regular supply of electricity has grounded activities of industries in this country. It is disgracing that after almost two decades of civil rule, we have not been able to increase power generation and distribution in any major marginal way beyond what the military left.
It is sad for a government that promises so much to now blame the last administration for its short coming. And those in charge of the power sector precisely, who were the major critics of the past government’s capabilities and incapacity not to be able to meet expectations of Nigeria. That I don’t think has to do with recession. If the government provides power, the industries will rev up, and if the industries are kick-started and attained the level it ought to be, the issue of unemployment would be taken care of. They claim they provide jobs, but I do ask: In what area of the economy are the jobs opportunity provided? I want to know the people they gave the job opportunities to.
In terms of provision of infrastructure, not much has been done, the Lagos-Ibadan road was being done at enviable rate when the last government was in power, until when that government was voted out of power, and the road construction was halted. I am quite sure there was quasi private sector involvement then. Suddenly, it was stopped and put totally under government budgeting process. You can still see that till today, construction work is going on the road, but much success would have been recorded if they had kept to the initial arrangement.

There is the issue of herdsmen killing people with none of them been brought to book; there is also Boko Haram, which the government said it has technically defeated even when they are still wrecking havoc; rising cases of kidnapping and the agitation Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Don’t you see the need to address the security challenges the country is facing?
Yes, there is the need to address the security challenges. The issue of kidnapping is worrisome and I believe there is the need for collaboration among the various security agencies. More so, the states should collaborate with them in tackling this security challenges because the Federal Government cannot tackle the problem alone. If the Federal Government gives a directive that the state should parley with the security agencies, it would help. You will discover that most of these security challenges are even beyond the police. So, the Federal Government should provide the necessary support, and in dealing with these challenges, party sentiments should be put aside.
Take for example, Ekiti State government first passed the anti grazing bill into law and other states followed suit. Why did it take other states so long to act? The governors need to be proactive. Sometimes, we have the assumption that only the Federal Government should get certain things done, but no. We need to take the state governors also to task on some of the challenges facing us as a nation. There is a need jobs creation, tackling of security challenges and provision of infrastructural facilities. You know that when people want to invest in the country, their first port of call is the state, but some of the state governors demand for impossible conditions from the investors. It is the business of state governors and local government to give investors a receptive welcome, but that is usually not the case. The states need to take the bull by the horn, even the issue of power supply. I see no reason why a state government can’t tackle issue of power generation as there is no law that forbids the state from building a power station. Instead, some governors are selling off power plants build by their predecessors. The placement of responsibilities should not rest on the shoulder of the Federal Government, local government chairmen and state governors have a major role to play in ensuring security and stability in the system to attract investors.

Does that not lay credence to the call for state police?
I agree there is the need for state police, it is a necessity and there is no way we can continue to shy away from it. At the federal level, they keep talking about community policing, but until it devolves to the local government level, there can never be an effective community policing. The last time the Badoo group struck in Lagos State, the deputy commissioner of police then, now the commissioner of police visited the affected areas and called all the traditional rulers to a meeting, threatening to hold any king with report of Badoo incident in his domain responsible. Since then, cases of Badoo group killing have gone down. Traditional rulers are the first and the nearest point to feel the pulse of the people, there is no person that comes to the community that they don’t have information about. So, I support state police, we need it, but all these can be done without the coordination at the centre, to use the Nigeria term.

How would you assess the government’s anti-corruption fight and the inter-agency conflict it has triggered?
There are two areas I may be unpopular. One, when this government came on board, we advised on amnesty on corruption. Let’s say you have a record of three people (A, B, C) being corrupt, and you have the figure of the amount they have embezzled, you can tell them to return 50 per cent of the amount stolen, and 25 percent to be invested by the culprit under state supervision, and keep the rest, and the person should be given a time frame to get it done, and if the person fails to do as directed, government will unleash the instrument of state on the person. I am happy that, that is the pronouncement of current president of Zimbabwe 24 hours after taking over. Why I supporting this approach is because it is what the Asian countries used, when they became sane to develop their system just as we are trying to be sane now.
If we don’t follow that path, then you need to go and look for a system, whereby you will arrest them, shame them, maim them, take them to court, until when they sign voluntarily or you win the case. Mind you, we are still fighting for the money stolen by General Sanni Abacha, many years after. Our money won’t be available when we need them most, they will be left in those countries for 20 to 30 years. Those countries would have invested the money, what they now pay us is the interest on the money, and that is where we found ourselves. Have we won any case since this government came on board? But, if the approach I suggested was applied, the government would have recovered a lot of money.
I do not believe that the anti-corruption agencies are going after only Buhari’s enemies. Let them fight any form of corruption, either his enemies or people close to him, at the end of his tenure he will leave office, whoever succeeds him will fight the other side. There is no time limit to fighting corruption.

Don’t you think that the approach you suggested will encourage corruption?
No, it will not. You have to draw a line, so that whoever steals after the amnesty for corrupt people would be jailed or killed like they do in China. For those who have stolen before then, that is what I think we should have done.

What about inter-agency conflict?
I think that is a dark side of this government. It portrays the President as not being in charge because there are things that are happening now that have never happened before. There is the need for government to call all these actors to order. We don’t need these distractions. We saw APC members fighting themselves and that was the beginning of the disconnect between the National Assembly and the Presidency and it has not healed up till now and business of governance get bogged down and the masses are at the receiving end. Mr, President needs to be advised to call for a harmony retreat, where all the three arms of government will agree to work and fight corruption and uphold government policies.

Giving of bailout to states to pay salaries of workers was not the practice before, but since the Buhari administration came on board, it has been giving bailouts to governors to pay their workers. Does the President has the power to direct the governors on how to spend the funds?
There is the need to know what the bailout is all about; is it money due to the states, or federal government’s money, and out of largesse it decided to assist the states. If it is Federal Government’s fund, then the President has a right to advice them how to spend it because he is giving it to them on such purpose. I am aware of many times, when the president with a condition of a particular road that is critical will give a state government, money to rehabilitate it. You can’t take the President money meant to rehabilitate a road and apply it somewhere else. If the governors were given the money to pay salaries, they can’t apply it somewhere else. I am sure in using the money accountability must have been ensured.

But some of these governors have been collecting the bailout funds and they refused to pay salaries. In some states, what workers earn at the end of the month is half of their respective salary…
It is totally wrong for governors not to pay salaries to their workers. The excuse given by some of the governors is hinged on paucity of funds and that they have more workforce than what the funds available can take care of, but that excuse is not tenable when funds are provided to pay the workers.

We talk about some states finding it difficult to pay workers, but the Federal Government has set up a committee on a new minimum wage. How feasible is that?
It is a very contradictory position. Out of the 36 states of the federation, how many of them are able to meet up with the salary obligation of their workers? When you now increase wages, how will they be able to pay? I don’t know if setting up of the committee on review of wages is just a gimmick or real. Let us wait for the committee to come up with its recommendation though I will say that the feasibility based on reality now is zero.

2019 general elections is around the corner. Wwhat do you think the electorate should do to ensure that Nigerians are not taken for a ride again?
Nobody can take us for a ride. I may not be Goodluck Jonathan fan though he is good friend. Let’s forget about him performing well in office or not; what Jonathan has done and we will forever be grateful to him is that he put in place a near perfect electoral system. That is so impossible to twist. When Godsday Orubebe and the rest were confronting Prof. Attahiru Jega over the outcome of the presidential election, Jonathan put a call across to Buhari and congratulated him on the outcome of the election.
We have a system put in place by Jonathan through which proper leaders chosen by the people can emerge. We have had couples of elections after the 2015 general elections, but we have never had a leader not chosen by the people and that is the solution to corruption and bad governance. That is why APC found it difficult to engage in hanky-panky in the elections so far conducted under them. It is impossible now to rig elections, so Nigerians should get ready to vote for the candidates they believe in come 2019. The electorate should not allow their conscience to be mortgaged; they should stop following rich politicians with dubious intentions, who will go into office to recoup money they spent.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Politics

No president has done as much as Buhari for Nigeria –Etiebet

Published

on

Former Petroleum Minister, Atuekong Don Etiebet, in this interview with TONY ANICHEBE, speaks on sundry issues. Excerpts:

 

Governor Nasir el-Rufai’s committee on restructuring has submitted its report to the Federal Government, where Akwa Ibom PDP leaders have lampooned the All Progressives Congress led government for contemplating the re-introduction of the outlawed Onshore/Offshore oil dichotomy in the country. What’s your take?

No! I don’t think that is what the committee meant. The problem of onShore/offshore oil dichotomy had been settled and it is settled that the literal states, where offshore production occurs within 240 nautical miles belongs to the literal states. So, I believe what the committee meant may be oil discovered or produced outside that isobar boundary, not within.

And if you look at the committee report, they didn’t mention anything about the area within the 240 isobar. So, let nobody be deceived or let nobody be confused that, the report meant production within the 240 isobars. That had been settled and you can quote me on that very seriously. If anything is done to get near towards that area, we shall oppose it vehemently.

Some people are campaigning against the return of President Buhari in 2019. Do you think they are justified?
Such a statement from such people is very unfortunate because, I have been playing politics and I am known for politics since I returned to this country. In fact after independence I left the country prior to the civil war and I came back in 1978, Since then I have been involved very seriously in politics; from the formation of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) and the National Republican Convention (NRC), which I played serious roles and held positions. Quote me, I have never seen an administration or a President that has done as much as Buhari has done to reposition this country to be a country or a nation of productivity. I mean a nation that can stand on its own and attain economic prosperity like other nations.

This country in the 50s was in a better economic footing than countries like Malaysia and South Korea. We had more tarred or asphalted roads in this country than South Korea and Malaysia itself. I have personally gone to Malaysia; the progress that this country had, the economic status, both in politics and everything this country had was as good at that time as India. Most of the achievements of what those countries have done now was because of good administration and leadership.

Don’t you agree that we have had good leadership in the past?
From independence we have never had good leadership. In fact, the only time that we had good leadership was in 1983/84 when this same Buhari had a coup and toppled Alhaji Shehu Shagari’s government and brought about some level of sanity, some level of lawfulness. This country has been besieged with lawlessness, impunity, indiscipline and serious corruption. Even the crude oil that we depend on, it was when Buhari came into office in 1984 as Head of State that, he identified the source of corruption in the oil industry as illegal bunkering.

Many governments in the past, even up till the last government had been supporting the illegal bunkering. I am a former Minister of Petroleum and I know the details. They have been supporting illegal bunkering. All these oil spills in the South-South zone, in the Niger Delta area that had become national and international problem, was caused by illegal bunkering, not by the oil producers.

The oil producers don’t go and lay pipes to transport crude oil or products and then go by themselves to go and cut those pipes and spill the oil; they don’t do that. They produce in other countries which I know and they are all over the world and, there is international means and ways of producing oil. If you destroy the environment, you are by law liable to clean up that environment.

For instance, when Mobil Rig exploded and the oil leaked in North America, they were held responsible to clean up. They cleaned up because it was their responsibility. When British Petroleum (BP) was drilling in the Mexican Gulf and the thing exploded underneath and a lot of oil went out and polluted the area, they were held liable to clean up.

They were fined and they accepted liability because it was act of their own activity but in Nigeria, the International Oil Companies (IOCs) have been refusing to clean up the spill because they say it is not caused by them, its caused by oil bunkers, who break the pipes in order to steal the products and illegally export, and that is what had been happening from the beginning.

So, as someone who comes from the Niger Delta, who also belongs to the PANDEF and I have been saying this over and over again that, our problem is caused by us because of corruption and illegal bunkering until the United Nations (UN) has come in. And every time you take the IOCs to court, they will plead that they are not responsible and Nigeria has never proven that they are responsible in breaking the pipes and allowing the crude oil to spill and we are witnesses to all the illegal attempts or the illegal activities of siphoning either crude oil or refined products to sell illegally and that is the cause of all these things in the Niger Delta.

How can bunkering be prevented?
It is only the present government that had taken steps to prevent bunkering. I know Mr. President when he was Head of State in 1984, the first statement he made was that, he was going to take steps to stop illegal bunkering by sinking any ship that is found with illegal crude oil. He made that statement and today, he is also standing by it because that is the source of our great worry. We produce more oil than we declare. So, where do the others go?

Two; if you can tell me that, there is ever a government in this country that had done enough to stop corruption or defective electoral process since independence, you let me know. Even former President Obasanjo went to the United States of America and made a statement that elections is a ‘do or die’ affair and that we are allergic to rigging.

He also said that, even America rigged elections. That is the beginning of corruption.
When you have faulty elections, when you have elections where people ‘carry go’, where people kidnap the electoral officers or point guns at them and sometimes, influence them with huge sums of money and later they will go and declare the result of such elections. When these leaders take over having known that they did not get into the office through the votes of the electorate, they will only pay attention to their godfathers, that had been the main source problem in this country and because of that we never had good governance.

Are you saying we have one now?
This is first time we have a government that has taken all the necessary steps to bring about good government. That is not to say that, the people are okay. You cannot stop this endemic corruption in the country that has come since independence till today overnight, and you cannot also kill all the people who were corrupt overnight so that they leave office, they are still there even in the civil service. The people who were there yesterday are still there till today.

But, he has created an atmosphere of fear and, I am sure you will believe me that this government has created an atmosphere of fear for people not to be corrupt as before. Look at what is happening in the case of Treasury Single Account (TSA); all of those trillion of naira that is in the bank now through the TSA, where were they before? It is the civil servants, public servant and the DGs etc that, were taking all the money and nothing was saved. That is why the country is even able to come out of secession because President Buhari has been able to get these monies that would have gone into private pockets.

The Minister of Financial the other day went to New York and said that, the former Nigerian government left an empty treasury and they have not come out to say they didn’t up till now. And you have also heard about all the monies that was lost in the Ministry of Petroleum; that quantum of money. You have heard about all the monies that lost in the Ministry of Defense which was meant for the fighting of Boko-Haram insurgency but, they didn’t use it. The Bible says, ‘‘seek ye first the kingdom of God, and all other things shall be added unto you’’.

The kingdom of God to reposition Nigeria for economic growth is to bring corruption to zero. It may not come fully to zero level but to reduce it to a level that can allow development. Corruption is not only bribery and giving money to people but corruption of the mind.

In this country, we talk about development. All the research institutions the colonialist set up in this country at least the nearest one for you in Akwa Ibom State was NIFOR. Where is NIFOR today? NIFOR was to research into the application of palm produce from Benin. That is what made Malaysia which took the seed of palm tree from here to go and grow in their domain.

Look at the foreign exchange that they have today and so, what is wrong with Nigeria? All the research institutions have failed because the people who are managing them once they take the money they will say they have done research but they don’t do anything. They will put the money in their pockets.

So, a lot of things have to be reprogrammed, restructured and repositioned for the country to move and you cannot achieve all that overnight. But President Buhari has laid the foundation for achieving that, and that is why I support him. Whether people like it or not, I am supporting him and certainly, whether they say he is not going to rule or the people would not want

him to win election, let me tell you; since 2003 President Buhari first entered into the presidential election, he has a base of support that you cannot dismantle. Whosoever comes from anywhere in this country cannot match Buhari with that base. Mr. President today has a base of 12 million votes whether you like it or not, whatever people would say cannot dismantle the 12 million votes.
In 2003, go and check the records 12m votes, In 2007, 2011 and 2015 plus the top up from other states like the South West that didn’t vote him before, like Kano which was PDP before, and Jigawa that was formerly PDP. So, he already has this base which no other person from any other party can match.

In the southern zones; in 2003, in the whole of the three southern zones of Nigeria, former President Obasanjo declared only 880 thousand votes for Buhari and declared over 12 million votes for himself. Go and check the records, I was there and I stopped the announcement of the results because I said it was not proper and correct. So, with that base, he already has what you cannot toil with, there is nothing you can say and there is no candidate from the North that can go to Borno State and get one vote, go the Sokoto and get one vote, go to Kano and get one vote.

In the North, whosoever they are, I am telling you that his base is there and those voters are there and you can’t dismantle them over night. Now, he is coming to the South East which knows they have a problem for not supporting him before. Mr. President has said, ‘‘you gave me 198,000 votes and, I am giving you four strong first class ministries’’ and they now said, we are now turning over to you in 2019. Former Governor Chime of Enugu, who gave him only 50,000 votes in 2015 is now in APC and all other persons are now in APC. In Akwa Ibom State, we gave him hundreds of thousands of votes but, there was no proper election in which we fought up to supreme court. So, he is going to win overwhelmingly. Buhari is sincere to build a new Nigeria and if for 57 years of independence, Nigeria is where it is today who do you blame? Blame the past leaders, this is the only leader that has started to lay foundation for a better economic growth.

Do you see Obasanjo and IBB’s letters to Buhari as threats to his re-election?
No threat at all. It’s only bad belle, everybody knows that because they always want to be relevant in the affairs of the country.

What is your expectation of Akwa Ibom APC in 2019?
We will win the election and take over the Hill–Top Mansion overwhelmingly, decisively and massively. APC is going to win the state massively because we are going to do proper election. PDP has never won election in this state without rigging. The only genuine election that was conducted in this state was the one I conducted in 1999 for Obong Victor Attah to win. In that election Obong Attah scored over 700,000 votes go and check the records. Obong Akpan Isemin scored about 400,000 votes. So, there was voting at that time.

Since then, tell me where has any opponent of the governorship candidate in Akwa Ibom scored 1/3 of what the winner scored because, they locked up the Returning Officers in some houses and pointed guns on their heads and forced them to sign the forms, after signing the forms for them, announced the results and after they would say; ‘‘let’s go to court’’.

That is what they have been doing before but, to God be the Glory, they are not going to be able to do that now. Even the Master of all that rigging; Mr. Godswill Akpabio has said it with his mouth that, Governor Udom Emmanuel should be very careful that now, there is not going to be ‘‘Carry – Go’’. That the electorates are going to vote and that votes shall be counted. And you are asking me if APC will win. We are going to win 100 percent and overwhelmingly.

As former Petroleum Minister, could you proffer solutions to the current fuel crisis in the country?
Who is still controlling the petroleum distribution in Nigeria? It is still the original PDP marketers. They are holding the entire nation to ransom. What is happening is that election time is coming and they are doing all kinds of things to ensure petrol scarcity and what do they want?, They want increase in petrol price so that they can use that against APC in the impending 2019 election.

Continue Reading

Politics

OBJ destroyed Nigerian federation, Buhari’s hasn’t done well –Akinrinade

Published

on

A former Chief of Defence Staff and chieftain of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), Lt. Gen Alani Akinrinade (rtd), in this interview with BABATOPE OKEOWO, spoke on the need for state police, among other national issues. Excerpts…

 

 

What is your view on state police?
My position is very clear; how best can you describe an official who has a land space peopled by the finest of humans who commissioned him freely by their votes to lead them, provided him with all the institutions for making laws for their betterment but has no means for enforcing those laws? A governor must have institutions to make laws and enforce those laws; that is what is called a governor, not an administrator.

All the troubles we are having in Nigeria today especially with regard to the Boko Haram could not have happened, we could have averted or at least minimize them if states have police which they train, equip and give assignments as per the security of the state, not beyond the state.

They will recruit the right people, most of them will be natives who understand the language, the culture of the people; they will know where to find information and people will really trust them. This is how it works everywhere. Why will I trust a policeman whose language I do not understand? Why would I give him information? Why would he not sell me out? Why should he be my friend? These are the issues all of us can see but we are just pretending.

How do you see the argument that governors will use state police to settle political scores?
We are just pretending that once we have state police, a governor will become a god and will start molesting people. That is not really true. The world has gone beyond that. Right now, if a governor does anything to anybody, within one hour, the whole social media would be awashed with it. We must live in the present, not in the past.

What then do you think is the way out of the pervasive insecurity in the country?
That is what we have been discussing. First of all re-engineer your whole architecture; we are not governed in the most effective way, there is too much of Abuja in everything. If anything happens today, the governor has not much say; he just puts it on Abuja. If the roads are bad, he says it is Abuja, if the water is not running, he says it is Abuja. It should not be so. The orientation should become very local; local government and the state government.

Again, the architecture for security will then change, if the governor should he held responsible for everything that happens in his state, therefore, he wants to know beforehand, not after the event. When the likes of Samuel Ortom started writing letters, nobody knew about it.

Eventually, it happened, they killed many people; then the argument started among all of them. Ortom said ‘I wrote to you, everybody is just laughing at me.’ It will not happen if the governor knows he should be held responsible. When we talk about restructuring, a lot of things need restructuring; even how we raise money, how it is spent, how it is accounted for. These things can never have any meaning unless you narrow it down to the basics people are asking for.

Some All Progressives Congress governors have reportedly endorsed President Muhammadu Buhari for second term, do you think this is a reasonable thing to do?
We should ask them if they went to their states, if they had referendum or they had already voted, so they are representing the views of their people backed by some form of plebiscites. But they are free to say whatever they like. But they also know their own people are free to vote them out. Everybody is at liberty to endorse anybody he wants.

What is your own assessment of President Buhari’s administration?
He has not done well; that is all I can say. In fact, below the expectation of what some of us had. May be we are expecting too much. But we know he has not done well. The past two or so years in our country, appear to me like a tragic thriller movie in slow motion, full of cruelty, of highest order of barbarity and egged on by those we elected or selected to give us governance. Herdsmen have been on the rampage for several months now, killing, raping, burning, kidnapping, name it, all the hallmarks of those who never exited the animal farm.

It was recently when our president was called out as the patron of his kinsmen, the herdsmen, that letters of complaints and its denials between the Federal Government, the police and governors in distress started circulating that he gave a feeble, unclear, half-hearted order to stop the carnage. Let us allow history to deliver its verdict after many more have died, but I am certainly tired and ashamed of being classified as a barbarian.”

Since you agreed that President Buhari has performed below expectation, do you think former President Olusegun Obasanjo is justified in his letter?
Watch the message not the messenger, don’t shoot the messenger. I am not going to shoot the messenger. The message has merit but the problem we have is that we are seeing the messenger. Obasanjo does not have the moral right whatsoever to criticise anybody. He has done more than anybody else in this country to destroy the federation we are now fighting for.

Could you give instances to buttress this point?
Was it not Obasanjo before 1978 when he was Head of State, when it was two months to the election and he knew that Chief Obafemi Awolowo was advocating free education and people were buying into it, who came up with policy to counter it? You know what he did? He quickly said the Federal Government would take over primary education and that it was going to be free just to take the wind out of the sail of Chief Awolowo. Obasanjo had been doing this for ages, he took over our universities and destroyed them.

Gen Ibrahim Babangida also wrote one; is there a gang up of the generals against Buhari?
I don’t know, I am not sure because I was not there. But I don’t think IBB will sit with Obasanjo to conspire against anybody. I doubt it. There may be some coincidences, but I am not for organised conspiracy.

Could you shed more light on your remark about Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)’s preparedness for the forthcoming election?
I said the clock has started ticking again to the periodic bloody ritual of election without the electorate. How do you rationalize INEC admitting recently that it was registering toddlers for election in the northern part of Nigeria on the pains of death.

What then happened to our humongous financial outlay of seven Infantry Army Divisions, a mighty Air Force and a Navy that supposedly rules our portion of the seas, hundreds of thousands of policemen and numerous other gun-totting formations, when mere threat of violence is all that is required to hold sway over law and order? Or are these pythons dancing? Where are the men who refuse to do the wrong things? Could INEC officials not have withdrawn their services and closed down all facilities? Are they collaborators?

Continue Reading

Politics

APC reconciliation: You’ve my full support, Oyegun tells Tinubu

Published

on

The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, yesterday said the party’s national leader, Bola Tinubu, has his “fullest” support on his reconciliation assignment.

An online news portal, TheCable had reported how Tinubu wrote a scathing letter to the national chairman of the party accusing him of sabotage.

“Instead of being a bulwark of support as promised, you positioned yourself in active opposition to the goal of resuscitating the progressive and democratic nature of APC,” the letter read.

But in his response sent to an online news portal, TheCable yesterday, Odigie-Oyegun was silent on the allegation of sabotage raised against him.

Odigie-Oyegun said: “I thank you for your letter dated February 21, 2018, for your prayers and good wishes for my health. I wish you the same and pray that our good God keeps you strong and grants you His peace,” Oyegun wrote in the letter dated February 23.

“Let me once again formally congratulate you on the peacemaking assignment Mr. President has entrusted you with.

“It is most challenging but I believe you will ultimately justify the confidence reposed in you by Mr President. In this, you have my fullest support.”

Oyegun sent copies of the letters to President Muhammadu Buhari, Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, Senate President Bukola Saraki and Yakubu Dogara, speaker of the House of Representatives.

Continue Reading

Trending

Take advantage of our impressive online traffic; advertise your brands and products on this site. Call

 

For Advert Placement and Enquiries, Call:

Mobile Phone:+234 803 304 2915

 

Online Editor: Michael Abimboye

Mobile Phone: 0813 699 6757

Email: mmakesense@gmail.com

 

Copyright © 2018 NewTelegraph Newspaper.

%d bloggers like this: