Connect with us

Opinions

Deadly herdsmen attacks

Published

on

A major crisis confronting the nation at the moment is the continued hostilities, wickedness and havoc being wrecked by herdsmen pastoralists in various parts of the country with recent cases being recorded in the middle-belt region.

Many people believe that with the poor handling of the menace and the audacity of the herdsmen, they could well be described as a new terrorist group distinct from the dreaded Boko Haram, Al-Shabab and the Islamic State in Iran and Syria (ISIS) and other militant groups.

It is instructive that the Global Terrorism Index 2015 had reported that Fulani militants remained the fourth most deadly terrorist group in the world!

Apart from the palpable fear caused victims, the most pathetic part of the calamity befallen our people is the blatant manner in which the unprovoked attacks are carried out on the defenceless, innocent and law-abiding members of communities across the geo-political zones of the country, as children and women are not left out in violence against humanity.

People have been made to become refugees in their abode.

The incessant attacks in Benue and other parts of the country suggest that the government is not placing adequate premium on the life of Nigerians.

What continues to be the crux of the matter is the illegal grazing of farmland, which invariably infringes on the right of farmers to plant and harvest their crops. What do we see? Herdsmen forcefully and indiscriminately allow their cattle to graze cultivated and other peoples’ sweat and farmlands by destroying valuable crops.

Any attempt to stop the herdsmen from illegal incursions often result into killing, raping, destroying farmlands as well as sacking whole communities.

Mixed reactions have continued to trail this unfortunate development with myriads of suggestions on the way forward. It is on this premise that, I find as very informative and revealing, two research reports from the Nigerian Working Group on Peace Building and Governance as well as the Chinua Achebe Centre for Leadership and Development on Fulani herdsmen attacks.

On one hand, the Nigerian Working Group on Peace Building and Governance, has observed that pastoralistsfarmers’ conflicts in the nation had grown, spread and intensified over the past decade. It noted that Nigeria has about 19 million cattle, mostly in the hands of pastoralists.

This phenomenal increase of the population has put enormous pressure on land and water resources used by farmers and pastoralists. One of the outcomes of this process has been the blockage of transhumance routes and loss of grazing land to agricultural expansion while the increased southward movement of pastoralists has led to increased conflict with local communities.

Recommendations given by the group include the establishment of grazing reserves, saying that the establishment of such reserves would provide the opportunity to practice more limited form of pastoralism as the nation has a total of 417 grazing reserves out of which only about 113 had been gazette.

It regretted that one of the greatest difficulties in addressing and resolving matters surrounding pastoralism was the politicisation of legal regimes and erection of blockages to the enactment or implementation of laws that can redress key challenges.

The group maintained that there was an emerging conflict between the constitutional principle on the free movement of persons, goods and laws emerging in some states by restricting movement.

In addition, pastoralism is not sustainable in Nigeria over the long term, due to the high population growth rate, expansion of farming and loss of pasture and cattle routes. It further called for digital tracking of cattle that would involve inserting microchips in the animal skin and tracking them with mobile phones.

Similarly, the Chinua Achebe Centre for Leadership and Development also made interesting findings. According to the centre, the herdsmen terrorists are mostly non-Nigerians and mainly migrants from Chad, Niger, and other Fulani enclaves outside the country.

They were said to be major actors and catalysts to recent conflicts in the Central African Republic. It noted further that herdsmen terrorists do not own cattle, as most of them are employed by the cattle owners as ‘security men’. The cattle are owned by prominent Fulani leaders in the country while they increase their wealth astronomically through cattle rearing.

The herdsmen do not follow the cattle around, but move in separate vehicles along a defined route. The report revealed that instead of investing in ranches and buying of grasses from the south, the herdsmen chose the cheaper alternative of taking the cattle from the north to south seasonally; using the entire Nigerian space as their ‘grass kingdom’.

This is rather unacceptable. Beyond the blueprint reeled out by both groups, I think there are several undercurrents that should be given desired attention. For instance, the Miyetti Allah, the umbrella body of herdsmen that had allegedly threatened to unleash mayhem if Benue State enforces the anti-grazing law, as passed by the State House of Assembly, should be called to order. To show the severity of the lawlessness that could ensue, Governor Samuel Ortom had to visit President Muhammadu Buhari in Abuja, to obtain assurances and support for the new law to work! Is this how to practice true federalism?

Is the government afraid of Miyetti Allah leadership for thorough investigation? The President recently admitted that poverty, injustice and lack of job opportunities were mainly responsible for inter and intra-communal crises in the country.

What concerted efforts are being made to address the high level of unemployment in the land? Another area that the Federal Government should be mindful of is the way and manner of deploying security machinery to tackle threats to peace.

Such interventions should not be seen as lopsided, biased and selective. For instance, unlike the approach adopted in dealing with militants in the Niger Delta and Boko Haram in the North-East, not much has been done to curb the excesses of the Fulani herdsmen. The government should continue to engage the leadership of the herdsmen by making them to realise that open grazing is no longer fashionable around the world, as even countries with large herds of cattle now raise their animals in ranches.

The position should be driven home with superior argument that animals deliberately supplied with feeds and other nutrients are healthier and better fattened, as against their itinerant breeds, as found here in Nigeria, where the animals face many risks while looking for what to eat.

To be fully convinced of government’s sincerity and sustainability, necessary policies should be put in place to assist farmers in the supply of pasture and other nutritious feeds to cattle. The government would douse the tension in the land by discouraging open grazing and confining all itinerant herdsmen to established ranches. This is in tandem with some of the recommendations made in the 2014 National Conference that is not receiving the deserved attention of government.

Traditional and religious leaders should intensify efforts by appealing to their subjects to embrace peace while those apprehended should be severally punished.

 

·Kupoluyi writes from Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (FUNAAB) via adewalekupoluyi@yahoo.co.uk

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions

Fractionalizing the power supply industry

Published

on

From the times of NEPA, meter has been an apple of discord in Nigeria. The Federal Government connived and the monolith became a law unto itself. Against the previous practice, it decided that customers should be paying for meters. Unhappily, most customers paid for several years, but many paid NEPA back claiming ownership and doing what they liked with meters. Revenue insecurity had begun and NEPA was in tatters.

 

Many years later, NEPA decided that customers should pay monthly charge for meter maintenance. However, it did no such maintenance. Many Nigerians were scandalized and they said so in newspaper articles. I challenged NEPA and the FGN in an article of eponymous title in my weekly column, Public Utilities Watch, in the Vanguard on March 11, 2003.

 

Electric power supply authorities have turned their backs on illegalities in the management of electric power in Nigeria for so long, they have, themselves, begun to create situations as defiant and disruptive of norms, as illegalities often are.

 

Let us look at the @NERCNG tweets – “The payment of metering service charge by the customer to the MAP shall cease upon full amortization of the meter asset over its technical life.” It talks of payment of a metering service charge. That is new. NERC had previously warned DISCOs not to charge for meters. And that was right because meter cost has always been part of monthly electricity rates that customers paid. For many years, that had amortized the meter cost over the service life of the instrument.

 

Clearly, Meter Assets Providers (MAPs) are, by the second @NERCNG tweet – “Where a customer elects to pay in full up-front for a meter under MAP, he/she shall be exempted from the payment of metering service charge” – to charge for meters throughout the service life of the instruments as well, although as meter service charge to the customer. That means that the MAPs have to prepare own bills, and customers have to pay to two, instead of one server. I argue that that will create a higher cost situation that will make rate hike inevitable.

 

The most challenging aspect of MAP, though, is that it is not specified in terms of sustainable infrastructure and technology, as well as finance. It will take Nigeria back to the mid-1960s. Then, meter touts swarmed the ECN with notes from some members of the Board of Management. But the corporation was up to the challenge. It had sent an engineer and three meter technologists to Uher in Vienna, Austria, for a three-month course in meter manufacture and testing. Through thorough testing and inspection, it was able to do away with the worst credit meters ever imported to this shore. How will Nigeria handle a similar situation today?

 

Nigerians usually do well at hawking anything. However, goods bought are sustainable only when backed by expert after-sales service. Sustainable infrastructure and technology would guarantee that for Nigeria. Without it, DISCOs would be better if they share meter maintenance technology directly with the meter manufacturers.

 

I warn that meter assets go far beyond the meter itself. Executive capacity, maintenance workshops and test laboratories are mandatory. It includes the ability to provide and test current and voltage transformers as accessories to industrial forms of metering, which must be tested along with those accessories. Remember that meters are the DISCO’s only true vehicles to legitimate revenue; and DISCOs are safer and better using their own meters!

 

Nigeria’s meter challenge evolved over more than 40 years. In a dynamic industry and situation, it is ludicrous to throw a fire brigade solution at it. Indications are that the country has more unmetered, than metered customers. Added to that, will be several new customers as well as old ones with obsolete meters to be replaced from time to time. And all of that against a backdrop of lean financial resource, desperate distribution networks to put right, and a deficit of technology as well as of executive capacity.

 

Clearly, this is an issue to last 10 to 12 years of organised effort. There should be annual budgets for meters and technical training, to increase meter availability and increase executive capacity. Done that way, Nigeria does not need to create a new class of licensees, such as MAP.
Besides, MAP, a clumsy attempt at solving an extant problem that is not clearly understood, creates more problems and solves none. Together with approved customers, they fractionalize the industry, and increase the per capita cost of the common facilities left to a reduced population, and a poorer load factor. And inevitably, rates must increase to barely sustain the industry. That is unhealthy for Nigeria’s electric power supply.

 

•Engr. Uwaifo writes in from Lagos

Continue Reading

Opinions

Jonathan had no hand in Aregbesola’s failed govt

Published

on

My attention has been drawn to a news item in which Osun State Governor, Rauf Aregbesola, was quoted to have blamed his underperformance in office on the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) administration of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan.

In the story published in some newspapers on Sunday, Aregbesola was said to have blamed his failure as a governor merely on the fact that his administration coincided with that of the PDP government at the centre, between the year 2010 and 2015, which according to him “was the most traumatised era in the history of Nigeria.”

I see this as the governor’s attempt to rewrite history by disingenuously seeking an accomplice for his dreadful failure in office. This should be prevented from entering public records, as he wished.

Ordinarily, it is considered a courageous act in governance to admit utter failure, as the governor attempted doing. Unfortunately, in this instance, Governor Aregbesola’s confession bordered on treachery, since he was neither sincere nor commonsensical. Rather than be the hero he sought to be, Aregbesola ended up as an anti-hero whose admittance of failure became mired in cowardice and deception, once he ventured lamely to seek an accomplice or a fall guy in the past PDP administration. His attempt to pass the buck failed woefully, as the public has seen it for what it is: a spineless act of dishonesty and contrived rectitude wearing a mask of false alibi and specious altruism.

In the first place, Aregbesola’s premise was wrong. Didn’t he realise that as semi-autonomous sub-national entities that control own revenues, states cannot reasonably yoke their fortunes with that of the Federal Government? Aregbesola should ask himself why his performance is far below the standards set by his counterparts in such states as Gombe, Ekiti, Ebonyi and Enugu. Like Aregbesola’s Osun, they are neither oil-producing nor high revenue earning states.

It would have been more honourable, and perhaps worthy of exculpation, if the governor had been man enough to take absolute responsibility for his monumental failure, without the futile effort to clutch at straws.

That Aregbesola failed as a governor is a fact known to not only the good people of Osun State but indeed all Nigerians. That he is also the architect of his disappointing performance is also incontrovertible.

An elected governor who waited for over two years before appointing commissioners or aides courted nothing but failure. Rather than apply discretion in policy choices, Aregbesola choose to lavish the state’s resources on grandiose white elephant projects that at best served as avenue for personal aggrandizement, to the detriment of workers’ welfare and the good of the people.

One of such extravagant projects was the Opon Imo, an e-learning ‘tablet of knowledge’ meant to ‘solve all’ secondary education needs of the state, which sadly became one of the biggest scams in the history of the state, with many close to him allegedly complicit in a contract scandal worth billions of Naira. It is instructive that while he was fiddling with his tacky Opon Imo project, the state which used to lead others in learning slipped into 29th position out of 36 on the scale of educational performance in Nigeria.

 

Another was the ill-advised school uniform policy which generated the kind of crisis that almost crippled the education system in the state. If Aregbesola had not been clueless and bereft of productive ideas, he would have taken a cue from the governors of other states with a similar mix in the religions of their population. Those hard working governors knew better than waste state time and resources in enforcing a controversial dressing code for schoolkids.

Nobody was then surprised when Aregbesola failed to pay the salaries of all civil servants and public sector workers for upwards of 12 months, a development that sparked unprecedented labour protests, and strident calls for his resignation. His failure in this regard was so glaring, that the predicament of Osun workers continues to elicit empathy and concern from across the country. Their situation was so desperate that philanthropists from outside the state were sending donations to the workers. One of such was from Ben Murray-Bruce, the Senator representing Bayelsa East Senatorial District, who offered, out of pity, to donate his N506,600 wardrobe allowance to Osun workers.

To be fair to him, Aregbesola once confessed that the state of affairs in Osun was beyond him, especially when it became obvious that he had practically brought the state on its knees.

It is instructive that various stakeholders, prominent individuals and organizations, have continued to call for his resignation, since 2015. One of such bodies, the Civil Societies Coalition for the Emancipation of Osun state (CSCEOS), had last year advised the state governor, to resign from office with immediate effect following his incompetence and the poor performance of students of the state public schools arising from his bad policies. The group said: “We, however, seized this opportunity to advise Mr. Rauf Adesoji Aregbesola to honourably tender his resignation from office as governor of Osun State because the present administration has become a disaster to the good people of Osun State in all human endeavours which has seriously retarded the educational sector of the state.

“This development has shown the world that Aregbesola lacks capability to run the state again and he should be relieved of his position in order to help the state to record the undiluted development and growth in all ramifications across the length and breadth of the state.”
It is this sordid state of affairs that pushed Justice Olamide Folahanmi Oloyede then of the Osun State Judiciary to take unusual step, by moving against the governor. Apparently unable to bear the governor’s missteps and unending blunder any longer, Justice Oloyede had in 2015 petitioned the State House of Assembly over what she termed Aregbesola’s financial recklessness.

 

It is therefore worrying that a man with this kind of odious public record would seek to compare himself with the administration of Goodluck Jonathan famed for its feat in reinvigorating education, reviving agriculture, strengthening democracy, and growing the economy to become not only Africa’s biggest, but the number one destination for foreign direct investment on the continent.

It is shocking that leaders like Aregbesola are allowed to blow their trumpet as probable messiahs in this dispensation. Little wonder then that the administration in which he is a key player, inherited a robust economy that was rated as one of the world’s best performing in 2015, but within a year brought it to a state where it now serves as a reference point for poor performance.

•Eze is Media Adviser to Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, President Federal Republic of Nigeria (2010-2015)

Continue Reading

Opinions

Tell Garba Sheu…

Published

on

Marxists are right when they posit that the society is in a state of constant flux; matter, of which human being is a part, is in a state of constant and ceaseless motion.

Thesis and anti-thesis interact or clash in a never-ending movement to produce new thesis and anti-thesis until the contradictions in capitalist societies like ours are resolved through the application of the Marxian ideology that resolves such conflicts in favour of the working class people.

 

To put it in another form, the only thing that is constant in life is change. Scriptures say there is nothing new under the sky; what is had been and will soon fade away; what was will become new again. In our daily life, we are subject to the indestructibility of change; we change tastes, fashion, and positions as we proceed through life.

 

We age gradually but in a ceaseless fashion until, finally, we change mortality for immortality, as the apostle Paul puts it. In 2015 Nigerians yearned for change. They were tired with PDP/Goodluck Jonathan and wanted a change. They reckoned that Jonathan was too slow, drab, and ineffectual. Put differently, they said he was not “presidential” enough or at all.

 

 

 

There were many issues they felt he did not effectively handle; was not trying hard to resolve or was not willing to resolve. One of such was the rabid and rampant corruption in his government. Nigerians cried for heads to roll but Jonathan offered none until it became too little, too late.

 

Another sore thumb was the insecurity of lives and property and the Boko Haram insurgency. The Islamists took territory after territory as government troops fled before them.

 

The height was the abduction of the Chibok girls. Nigerians’ standard of living dropped sharply and government had no answer to the social malaise of worsening unemployment, rising crime rate, and collapsed infrastructure all over the place. It was therefore not difficult for Nigerians to agree with the then opposition party’s characterization of the Jonathan administration as “incompetent and clueless”.

 

Come election D-Day and tried as Jonathan/ PDP did, they were rejected at the polls. In truth, that election was not fool-proof as it was blatantly rigged for the APC/Muhammadu Buhari in some parts of the country, especially in Kano.

 

Nigerians generally turned a blind spot to the shenanigans of that election because they were tired of Jonathan.

 

The international community, too, leaned on Jonathan to accept the results of that fraudulent election, which he could have contested. So, wise and patriotic Jonathan vacated office and the “messiah” Buhari and APC took over. Nigerians had high hopes in Buhari/APC. During the campaigns, they promised to end the Boko Haram insurgency within three months.

 

They said they would also end corruption as well as revamp the economy so much so that one Naira will equate one US dollar.

 

Nigerians were elated but three years hence, Buhari/ APC have not delivered on any of their campaign promises. In fact, matters have become worse on all fronts, prompting Nigerians to now say that things don’t get better here, they only get worse. And you cannot blame them for becoming this pessimistic. With the faith and confidence reposed in Buhari, the thinking now is that if Buhari fails to get the job done, then, no one else will.

 

And, sadly, Buhari has not only failed to get the job done, he has made matters worse for the people. The Yoruba have a saying, to wit, if I run to a god to help ameliorate my parlous condition, if it fails to do so, it should at least not make my condition worse.

 

Nigerians deified Buhari, taking him like a god, but not only has he failed to deliver, he has made the people’s situation worse. Before he became president, he boasted and promised heaven and earth but after the people made him president, the first thing he began to do was to deny many of his promises and speeches. Even the ones he admitted making, he has failed to deliver.

His case became like that of a man made the king of hawks but who could not snatch chicks from the mother hen. Propaganda rather that real deliverables have become the hallmark of APC/Buhari administration. The PDP/Jonathan administration has, interestingly, also become its benchmark. Nigerians are alarmed that Buhari can perform so miserably.

 

Since Buhari/APC prefers to use PDP/Jonathan as benchmark, they can be told that the former president had a firmer grip over his government and party than Buhari. Right from day one, Buhari threw away the control of his own party; the consequence is there for everyone to see today. Cabals control the Buhari government more than they did Jonathan’s.

 

To make matters worse, the Buhari presidency is divided and always quibbling and quarrelling. We have never had a government so disorganised and so irresponsible. Buhari has not been able to instil discipline and order in his own government.

 

His orders are even flouted, as the Inspector-General of Police made it known to all of us, and as the ex-Secretary of the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, asked sarcastically, “Who is the Presidency?” Buhari’s reputation as a no-nonsense leader is gone with the winds. Corruption thrives under Buhari just like it did under Jonathan.

 

Many aides of Buhari are as corrupt as Jonathan’s. Like Jonathan/PDP, Buhari/APC have also treated the corruption of their inner circle members as “family affairs”. Cries that Buhari turn over for prosecution those around him accused of corruption have gone unheeded; even those caught in the brazen act have been shielded from prosecution by Buhari. Unfortunately, this is one area in which the President and spin doctor Garba Sheu think they have performed admirably, but the verdict, home and abroad, is that they have not.

 

In returning Nigeria’s stolen money, the international community now imposes more stringent conditions on Buhari/APC than they did Jonathan/PDP because they have seen that under Buhari/ APC, despite all the anti-corruption noise and propaganda, recovered loots are being re-looted with reckless abandon.

 

The economy under Buhari is in shambles and in a worse state than under Jonathan/PDP. More jobs have been lost; lesser jobs have been created; more industries have closed down, the Naira’s value has been cut by more than half; fuel prices have doubled; more subsidies on fuel are being paid under the counter; the country’s debt overhang has more than tripled; and the state of our infrastructure has not improved in any significant way. Buhari/APC cannot point at signature projects they have executed all over the country.

 

To make matters worse, Buhari has hopelessly divided the country with his inflammatory and divisive statements that favour his region and religion above others. He has also done similarly with his appointments and policies.

 

He has not behaved as the president of the entire country, but as the president of one region and one religion. His tacit support for the murderous herdsmen that have turned Nigeria into a killing field will forever remain the greatest blemish in this regard. Even Boko Haram he is yet to defeat.

 

The evidence is the Dapchi abduction and the continued incarceration of Leah Sharibu and others. Someone should therefore tell Garba Shehu that these and many other reasons are why Nigerians are clamouring for another change. They want to change the change because Buhari and APC have not performed.

 

 

They have been a let-down. In addition, they are becoming increasingly intolerant and destructive of our renascent democracy – and Nigerians are not ready to go back to the era of totalitarianism and military jackboot.

Continue Reading

Trending

Take advantage of our impressive online traffic; advertise your brands and products on this site. Call

 

For Advert Placement and Enquiries, Call:

Mobile Phone:+234 803 304 2915

 

Online Editor: Michael Abimboye

Mobile Phone: 0813 699 6757

Email: mmakesense@gmail.com

 

Copyright © 2018 NewTelegraph Newspaper.