Connect with us

News

Sacked NIA’s DG approaches court, seeks reinstatement

Published

on

The sacked acting Director General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), Ambassador Mohammed Dauda, yesterday approached the National Industrial Court (NIC) sitting in Abuja, challenging his dismissal and praying the court to reinstate him.

 

Dauda, in an originating summons filed through his counsel, Kanu Agabi (SAN) and marked NICN/ ABJ/136/2018, joined the DG, NIA and the NIA as first and second defendants respectively.

The claimant is asking the court to determine whether the procedure adopted by the defendants in the process leading to his purported dismissal is in compliance with Article 8(1) and (2) of the National Securities Agency Act (CAPS 278) 1986.

 

He also wants the court to determine whether in view of the extant provisions of Article 8(1) and (2) of the National Securities Act (CAPS 278) 1986, retired Directors of NIA are competent to sit as members in the Senior Staff Disciplinary Committee (SSDC) and if not, whether the failure of the defendants to set up a competent Senior Staff

Disciplinary Committee (SSDC) to look into the allegation levied against him constitutes a violation of his constitutional right to fair hearing.

 

The claimant equally asks the court to declare the purported letter dismissing him issued by the defendants on March 6, 2018 as unlawful, null and void and of no effect whatsoever.

 

He, however, prays the court that in the circumstance of affirmative answers to the questions, whether he is not entitled to be reinstated as Director of NIA. He, therefore, prays the court for a declaration that the procedure adopted by the defendants in the process leading to his dismissal falls short of the provisions of Articles 8(1) and (2) of the National Securities Agency Act (Cap 278 LFN) 1986 and is null and void.

 

He also prays the court for a declaration that by virtue of the provisions of Articles 8(1) and (2) of the National Securities Agency Act (Cap 278 LFN) 1986, retired Directors and ormer members of the NIA are not competent to sit as members in the Senior Staff Disciplinary Committee.

 

The claimant further asks the court to declare that the failure of the defendants to set up a competent Senior Staff Disciplinary Committee to look into the allegations levelled against him is a violation of his constitutional right to fair hearing. Also, he wants the court to declare that the purported letter of his dismissal issued by the defendants on March 6, 2018 is unlawful, null and void and of no effect whatsoever.

 

He, therefore, prays for an order of court reinstating him as a Director and the Acting Director General of the NIA. He is also praying the court for an order for the payment of his salaries and entitlements from the period of his unlawful dismissal to the point of his reinstatement. No date has been fixed for the hearing of the matter.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

Pages

Close

Trending

%d bloggers like this: